The CPU (central processing unit) is the general computing component. They’re designed for efficiency as much as performance- typically only drawing around 5 watts.ĭespite these limitations, the massive investment in R&D on mobile chips over the past decade, driven by the huge smartphone & tablet industry, means Quest 2’s Snapdragon XR2 holds up surprisingly well. Mobile chips have to make sensible use of the onboard battery, and there’s much less space for the cooling system. Quest 2 uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 chipset, which is a variant of the Snapdragon 865 chip used in high end smartphones like Samsung’s Galaxy S20 Ultra. They draw hundreds of watts to achieve maximum performance. Gaming PC and consoles use your essentially-unlimited mains power and tend to have a powerful cooling system involving multiple large fans. But just how powerful is it? Can it compare to a PlayStation or PC? So if there is an issue I'm sure it will be corrected.Oculus Quest 2 is the hottest thing in VR right now- the most powerful standalone VR headset you can buy. Regardless, ManuelG posted on the Nvidia forums that the driver teams are looking into it. It's pretty clear that Kepler performance was maxed. 780 only showed a ~8-10% increase during it's lifetime. The 680 showed a 25% increase in performance from drivers over it' lifetime. Driver improvements slowed with Kepler by the time it was finished anyway. I think more than likely Maxwell is just getting the better end of the deal with drivers. Show me the 3DMark/Any Benchmark between release drivers of Maxwell and current drivers of Maxwell. Show me a driver where a Kepler series card performs 20% slower.ī. The only real way to see if Nvidia is "downgrading" performance is to either A. Now it seems like a 960 is about 2-5% slower. Now it seems like it's about 30-40% faster then a 780Ti in most recently released games.Ī 960 was also about 20% slower then a 780. At launch a 980 was on average about 10-15% faster then a 780Ti. I mean basically it seems like Maxwell on average is performing 20% faster than it was at launch. Idk, honestly I'd like to see a 980's 3DMark scores over the last several driver releases. The gtx 980 is a tad ahead of the 290x as usual, while the 780 ti is waaaaay behind the 290x - the same can be seen with all the other kepler Cards, with the 780 almost performing the same as a freaking 960. Some people claim its simply because Maxwell has been optimized, but if that was the case, then a gtx 980 should be MILES ahead of a 290x, and a 780 ti should still be on par with the 290x, but it isnt. Īaaand yet another benchmark that shows what all other benchmarks has shown - kepler having been seriously downgraded (intentional or accidental - im leaning towards intentional). The trailer is impressively cut and is heavy on the emotions. The Witcher 3: Wild. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Go Your Way (videos) - 05:23 AMĬD Projekt RED has released the launch trailer for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ahead of the game's release tomorrow. Some media had pre-release materials available to produce benchmark results for Witcher 3. Own a Titan GeForce GTX TITAN X and want The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt for free ? Nvidia is running a promotions, just install GeForce Experience and you can redeem a coupon code eligible for Steam. The Witcher 3 Wild Hunt free for Titan X owners - 11:54 AM We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. In this article we benchmark The Witcher III on the PC - many graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. The Witcher III Wild Hunt VGA Performance review - 02:52 PM If you have an AMD cards and want to run The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt with HairWorks enabled, here's a nice tweak originating from our own forums. . The Witcher 3 HairWorks on AMD GPUs With Normal Performance - 08:13 AM
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |